All posts by Lao Xia

Apology Week

  
It must be hard to be a Muslim in the west these days. Whether you are an open-minded, moderate Muslim or not, you will probably meet several people that expect you to speak out against extremist violence. 

It is good for Muslims to stand up against extremist violence. No doubts about that, but it makes me wonder how fair it is to expect a firm stance from others and at the same time expect nothing much from ourselves. Are we aware enough of our own collective responsibilities? 

Not all acts of violence are as visible as a brutal bomb attack. Violence has many forms. In our modern societies we have become alienated from the effects of our collective actions. I am afraid that in the end we are all big shareholders of violence. 

While I was thinking about this last week, I wondered why there is no International Apology Day? We have special days for everything. 

I googled a little bit and found out that Australia already has a National Sorry Day to remember and commemorate the mistreatment of the country’s indigenous population. 

Is one day enough? 

Most of these special days pass unnoticed and have no lasting effect. If we are to apologise for all the violence in the present and the past committed by all the groups we belong to or descent from, we need a whole week at least!

Only a full week of apologies and reflection may actually change something in our hearts. 

It is a crazy idea. I do not expect it to become very popular. Nobody likes to make apologies. Sorry really seems to be the hardest word. Even the easiest spontaneous excuses for small discomforts we cause to others seem on the decline these days. 

Collective apologies are always extremely delicate. Especially nations have huge difficulties with this. If national apologies are ever made, they often take place many years after the facts. 

Apologies have no value if they are imposed. An Apology Week can be facilitated in many ways, but the apologies should always remain voluntary. 

If there is ever going to be a public Apology Week, it has to start with a few individuals or small groups of individuals. 

So why not give it a try? This website is my personal breeding ground for religious (or philosophical) experiments. Apology Week week could very well become part of my personal religion. 

The week before winter solstice (15 to 21 December), just before Christmas and the New Year, seems to be a perfect timing. All these festive days are related in various ways and mark a new beginning. It is always a good idea to have a period of reflection before a celebration and especially before good resolutions.

There is only one “problem” with this timing. My first personal Apology Week will start already in two weeks! This leaves me with very little time to think it all over and make proper arrangements.

So this first year will most likely only be a test: a week of meditation and reflection on how an Apology Week could be celebrated in a meaningful way.

Since this website is so small and the whole idea so new, I am a bit reluctant to ask already for ideas and support. But I may be wrong…

Apology Week needs some structure. I think each day should be directed to a different category of apologies. 

For example:

  • Day 1: Apologies to the Earth
  • Day 2: Apologies to animals
  • Day 3: Apologies to social groups
  • Day 4: Apologies to women 
  • Day 5: Apologies to cultures (or nationalities)
  • Day 6: Apologies to minorities
  • Day 7: Apologies to individuals

As you can see, this is already quite a list! 

There can be no apologies without true feelings of guilt. Still, it is not my intention to feel terribly bad about myself during this week. 

Apologies often lead to feelings of relief, but I am afraid that in this case such effects will be limited. I do not feel particularly guilty now. There will be no acceptance. No absolution. During Apology Week feelings of guilt and apologies will only increase reciprocally.

It all has to be a matter of proportion. Collective feelings of guilt and apologies should always stay within a just collective proportion for an individual person. 

It is no use for anyone to put all the blame of the world on his or her shoulders.

The main purpose of my first personal Apology Week will be to increase my own collective sensibilities. 

If Apology Week would ever go public, this main purpose can probably stay als it is. No need to aim for reconciliations, most of us have still work to do on our non-selective collective sensibilities.

Our collective capacity to inflict harm upon the world and others has way surpassed our natural sensibilities as human beings. An Apology Week could very well prove to be a useful ritual to increase our collective sensibilities. 

If so, an International Apology Week week will almost naturally lead to more compassion in the world and eventually also to collective acts of compassion as well. 

Collective acts of compassion are more needed than ever.

Sacred reading glasses

gamma glasses

How to read sacred texts? Whether you believe in them or not, reading sacred scriptures requires some skill. Not an expert myself, last week two writers on religious thought made it clear to me that the need for this skill may be higher than ever before. It made me think that imaginary “gamma glasses” may be a useful companion to these scriptures, especially for beginners.

“Vacuous literalism” (Maajid Nawas)

Concerned with the rise of extremism, I read “Islam and the future of tolerance” a dialogue between Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz. Nawaz, former Islamist radical and now advocate for a moderate Islam, stresses in this book that in order to interpret any text one must have a methodology.

According to him the rise of the internet has facilitated “populist” interpretations of Islamic texts. He calls this “vacuous literalism”, a method that accepts a holy text word for word, without bothering at all about contradictions within the text.

Unparalleled literalness (Karen Armstrong)

A few days later I heard Karen Armstrong saying something similar in Salt Lake City at the Parliament of the World’s Religions in a video stream of a session with the ominous title “Killl them (Qu’ran), Do Not Spare Them (Torah), and Cast Them Into Everlasting Fire (New Testament)”.

Representing the Christian tradition Armstrong said that “we are reading our scriptures these days with a literalness that has no parallel in the history of religion.”

She went on to talk about Augustine of Hippo (354-430) who was convinced that all scripture should teach only charity. “If a scriptural text seemed to preach hatred, you had to find an allegorical interpretation and make it speak of charity”.

She reminded that Origen (184-254), one of the first Christian exegetes, had already concluded that you cannot take Bible texts literally, because they are so contradictory. Origen introduced “a method whereby you interpreted scripture in four different ways, starting with the plain text, then moving on to the allegorical text, the moral text and finally the mystical text”.

Is true reading even possible?

Maajid Nawas refers in his dialogue to the essay “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas” of Quentin Skinner. In this essay Skinner addresses “the danger in assuming that there is ever a true reading of texts and asks the question: does any piece of writing speak for itself? Or do we impose certain values and judgements on that text when interpreting it?”

Personally I think this is inevitable. We always bring our own sensitivities into the texts we read, whether we are conscious of this or not. Our own experiences are also necessary, because they enable us to relate or identify ourselves with a text.

“Gamma glasses”

It is often said that reading, especially reading of literature, increases our empathic capacities. We can ask ourselves how many people are still influenced by this positive effect. Probably a lot of inexperienced readers nowadays turn directly to holy scriptures.

Therefore imaginary “gamma glasses” could be a great companion. How does this work?

Imagine that you put these “gamma glasses” on and start to read the scriptures from a perspective of gratitude and with only one objective in mind: to become more compassionate. Then consider carefully how to apply what you have learned in just proportion.

These “gamma glasses” will, as glasses always do, at least correct some shortsightedness.

If you do this consciously, there is another advantage: as long as you are aware that you are wearing imaginary glasses, you also know that you are not necessarily reading the truth.

“Gamma glasses” are a bit like coloured glasses that make you read with a rosy view.

They may not help to find the “truth” in sacred scriptures, but they certainly can show you their true colours.

Presentation video

This is a short video that explains the basics of the gamma way.

I made it for for the Interfaith Exhibit space at the Parliament of World’s Religions that will take place in Salt Lake City later this week.

The Parliament of the World’s Religions has a history that goes back to 1893 and was created “to cultivate harmony among the world’s religious and spiritual communities and foster their engagement with the world and its guiding institutions in order to achieve a just, peaceful and sustainable world”.

I would have loved to go to Salt Lake City, listen to inspiring talks and attend several of its interesting workshops and meetings. It seems to be the perfect occasion to meet like-minded people, learn from various religious traditions around the world and in the meantime also get some valuable feedback, inspiration and suggestions for this website.

Even though I will not be able to be in Salt Lake City, I am very grateful that unexpectedly I got the opportunity to contribute something to the Interfaith Exhibit at the Parliament of World’s Religions.

The Interfaith Exhibit is organised by four organisations working together: Charter for Compassion International, Wisdom Circle, United Religions Initiative and North American Interfaith Network.

The gamma symbol provides me with a common ground to face all religions with an open mind. I hope the Parliament of World’s Religions will be able to provide all religions with a common ground to face the challenges of our times.